Table 10: Selected biomarkers with potential for future clinical use in the management of HF

Biomarkers: Cardiac hs-troponins
Pathophysiological pathways/comorbid conditions with prognostic implications
Myocyte death
HF populations targeted
Acute and chronic HF
Advantages
Very sensitive marker predicting higher risk of CV events regardless of etiology
Potential Benefits
Optimization of therapy in patients with elevated hs-cTn should be more aggressive
Challenges before implementation
Prognostication improves only for mortality and use to modify therapy has not been tested

Biomarkers: sST2
Pathophysiological pathways/comorbid conditions with prognostic implications
Fibrosis/inflammation/immunity
HF populations targeted
Acute and chronic HFrEF, HFpEF, and previously low EF recovered
Advantages
Additional prognostic value beyond NPs suspected low week-to-week variations
Potential Benefits
Could provide additional value for short and long term prognostication, regardless of LVEF
Challenges before implementation
Unclear if using sST2 in acute or chronic HF to modify therapies improves clinical outcomes

Biomarkers: Procalcitonin
Pathophysiological pathways/comorbid conditions with prognostic implications
Bacterial infection
HF populations targeted
Acute HF
Advantages
Early detection of bacterial infection
Potential Benefits
Guiding antibiotic therapy in acute HF and suspected respiratory infection
Challenges before implementation
Levels are increased in HF without ongoing bacterial infection. No clear cutoff has been identified in the HF population.

Biomarkers: Galectin-3
Pathophysiological pathways/comorbid conditions with prognostic implications
Cardiac and vascular fibrosis
HF populations targeted
Incident HF, HFrEF and HFpEF
Advantages
Early detection of risk and long term prognostication in HF
Potential Benefits
Preventive measures and therapy optimization based on levels could improve outcomes
Challenges before implementation
ST2 may be superior to galectin-3 in a multivariable risk prediction model

Biomarkers: Cystatin C
Pathophysiological pathways/comorbid conditions with prognostic implications
Renal Function
HF populations targeted
Acute and chronic HF
Advantages
More sensitive detection of changes in renal function
Potential Benefits
Preventive measures and therapy optimization based on levels could improve outcomes
Challenges before implementation
Unclear if using cystatin C, over using eGFR, to modify clinical management provides further clinical benefit

Biomarkers: NGAL
Pathophysiological pathways/comorbid conditions with prognostic implications
Renal Function
HF populations targeted
Acute HF
Advantages
Early detection of renal function deterioration
Potential Benefits
Adjusting therapy to improve prognosis by avoiding acute renal failure progression
Challenges before implementation
Unclear if using NGAL in acute HF to modify therapies improves clinical outcomes

*This list is not exhaustive; multiple biomarkers have been and are being studied.

CV, cardiovascular;
EF, ejection fraction;
eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate;
HF, heart failure;
HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction;
HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction;
hs, high-sensitivity;
hs-cTn, high sensitivity cardiac troponin;
LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction;
NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin;
NPs, natriuretic peptides;
sST2, soluble toll-like receptor-2.