Authors
Diodati JG, Saucedo JF, French JK, et al.
Title
Effect on platelet reactivity from a prasugrel loading dose after a clopidogrel loading dose compared with a prasugrel loading dose alone: Transferring From Clopidogrel Loading Dose to Prasugrel Loading Dose in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients (TRIPLET): a randomized controlled trial.
References
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:567-574
Background
Adding a prasugrel loading dose (LD) to a clopidogrel LD could be desirable because clopidogrel may fail to provide adequate levels of platelet inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Purpose
  • To evaluate the use of a prasugrel 60 mg loading dose (LD) administered during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with and without a prior LD of clopidogrel on platelet inhibition in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
  • Platelet inhibition following a prasugrel LD in clopidogrel pretreated patients was determined in a time-dependent manner for two different prasugrel loading doses (30 mg and 60 mg).
  • To provide understanding of the effects of this combination on platelet inhibition to physicians for the use of prasugrel in patients who have already been pre-treated with clopidogrel.
Design
  • Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, 3-arm, parallel, active-comparator controlled study performed at 36 sites in 8 countries
  • Designed to evaluate the pharmacodynamic response in ACS patients who are likely to undergo PCI using 3 different strategies: placebo plus prasugrel 60 mg LD, clopidogrel 600 mg LD plus prasugrel 60 mg LD, or clopidogrel 600 mg LD plus prasugrel 30 mg LD
  • 282 patients were randomized
  • The primary end point for this study was the VN-reported PRU, measured 6 hours after prasugrel LD
  • Platelet function was assessed using VerifyNow P2Y12 Reaction Units (PRU) immediately before prasugrel LD, and 2, 6, 24, and 72 hours after prasugrel LD
Exclusion Criteria
  • High risk of bleeding
  • Previous history of transient ischemic attack or stroke.
Follow-Up
72 hours
Treatment Regimen
3 different strategies: placebo plus prasugrel 60 mg LD, clopidogrel 600 mg LD plus prasugrel 60 mg LD, or clopidogrel 600 mg LD plus prasugrel 30 mg LD
Results
Primary Endpoints:
  • At 6 hours after the prasugrel 60 mg LD, the least squares mean (95% confidence interval) difference between placebo/prasugrel 60 mg and clopidogrel 600 mg/prasugrel 60 mg (primary outcome) was 22.2 (−11.0 to 55.5; P=0.19; least squares mean PRU 57.9 versus 35.6, respectively)

Secondary Endpoint:

  • For clopidogrel 600 mg/prasugrel 30 mg (least squares mean PRU, 53.9), the difference was 3.9 (−28.2 to 36.1; P=0.81) versus placebo/prasugrel 60 mg.
  • No significant differences in PRU were observed at any time point across the 3 groups.
  • There were few bleeding events observed regardless of treatment.
Summary
Platelet reactivity with prasugrel 60 mg LD added to clopidogrel 600 mg LD was not significantly different compared with prasugrel 60 mg LD alone in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Implications
This is a pharmacodynamic study without assessment of major clinical endpoints. Current guidelines do not advocated adding a prasugrel loading dose to a clopidogrel loading dose.
Related Figures
None.