AS jet velocity (m/s)
Direct measurement
Cutoff for Severe:4.0
Concept:Velocity increases as stenosis severity increases.
Advantages:Direct measurement of velocity. Strongest predictor of clinical outcome.
Disadvantages:Correct measurement requires parallel alignment of ultrasound beam. Flow dependent.
Mean gradient (mmHg)
ΔP ∑4v2 / Ν
Cutoff for Severe:40* or 50**
Concept:Pressure gradient calculated from velocity using the Bernoulli equation.
Advantages:Mean gradient is averaged from the velocity curve. Units comparable to invasive measurements.
Disadvantages:Accurate pressure gradients depend on accurate velocity data. Flow dependent.
Continuity equation valve area (cm2)
AVA = (CSALVOT × VTILVOT)/VTIAV
Cutoff for Severe:1.0
Concept:Volume flow proximal to and in the stenotic orifice is equal.
Advantages:Measures effective orifice area. Feasible in nearly all patients. Relatively flow independent.
Disadvantages:Requires LVOT diameter and flow velocity data, along with aortic velocity. Measurement error more likely.
Simplified continuity equation (cm2)
AVA = (CSALVOT × VLVOT)/VAV
Cutoff for Severe:1.0
Concept:The ratio of LVOT to aortic velocity is similar to the ratio of VTIs with native aortic valve stenosis.
Advantages:Uses more easily measured velocities instead of VTIs.
Disadvantages:Less accurate if shape of velocity curves is atypical.
Velocity ratio
VR = VLVOT / VAV
Cutoff for Severe:0.25
Concept:Effective aortic valve area expressed as a proportion of the LVOT area.
Advantages:Doppler-only method. No need to measure LVOT size, less variability than continuity equation.
Disadvantages:Limited longitudinal data. Ignores LVOT size variability beyond patient size dependence.

VR, Velocity Ratio; LVOT, LV outflow tract; ΔP, mean transvalvular systolic pressure gradient; AVA, continuity-equation-derived aortic valve area.

*AHA/ACC Guidelines, **ESC Guidelines