| Signs | |
|---|---|
| Specific signs for AR severity | |
Mild:
| |
| Supportive signs | |
Mild:
| |
| Quantitative parameters(4) | |
| R Vol (mL/beat) | |
| Mild: | <30 |
| Mild-Moderate: | 30-44 |
| Moderate-Severe: | 45-59 |
| Severe: | ≥60 |
| RF (%) | |
| Mild: | <30 |
| Mild-Moderate: | 30-39 |
| Moderate-Severe: | 40-49 |
| Severe: | ≥50 |
| EROA (cm2) | |
| Mild: | <0.10 |
| Mild-Moderate: | 0.10-0.19 |
| Moderate-Severe: | 0.20-0.29 |
| Severe: | ≥0.30 |
AR, Aortic regurgitation; EROA, effective regurgitant orifice area; LV, left ventricle; LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract; R Vol, regurgitant volume; RF, regurgitant fraction.
Based on data in the literature and a consensus of the committee members, the Task Force proposes a scheme of specific signs (≥90% specificity), along with supportive signs whose predictive accuracy is more modest, and quantitative parameters for AR severity (Table 2). In applying this scheme, it is the consensus of the committee members that the process of grading AR should be comprehensive using a combination of these signs, clues and measurements obtained by Doppler-echocardiography.